Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 95
Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, et al v. United States Army Corps We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-5197
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: Dakota Access LLC
Plaintiff / Appellee: Oglala Sioux Tribe, 17cv267, Robert Flying Hawk, 16cv1796, Chairman of the Yankton Sioux Tribe Business and Claims Committee, Standing Rock Sioux Tribe and others
Not Yet Classified: Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe and Steve Vance
Defendant / Appellee: United States Army Corps of Engineers
Amicus Curiae: North Dakota Grain Dealers Association, North Dakota Farm Bureau, American Line Pipe Producers Association and others
Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, et al v. United States Army Corps
as 20-5201
Amicus Curiae: State of North Dakota, State of Arkansas, State of Ohio and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: Robert Flying Hawk, 16cv1796, Chairman of the Yankton Sioux Tribe Business and Claims Committee, Yankton Sioux Tribe, 16cv1796, Oglala Sioux Tribe, 17cv267 and others
Defendant / Appellant: United States Army Corps of Engineers
Not Yet Classified: Steve Vance and Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: Dakota Access LLC
JANI-KING INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al v. UNITED STATES SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION et al
as 1:2020cv00989
Plaintiff: Jani-King International, Inc., Ohio Services-CLE, Inc., Jani-King Franchising, Inc. and others
Defendant: JOVITA CARRANZA and UNITED STATES SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
Not Classified By Court: SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
STATE NATIONAL BANK OF BIG SPRING et al v. GEITHNER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv01032
Defendant: TIMOTHY F. GEITHNER, THOMAS M. HOENIG, ELIZABETH DUKE and others
Petitioner: VICTOR WILLIAMS and SEAN P. DUFFY
Plaintiff: STATE OF NEBRASKA, STATE OF OHIO, STATE OF MONTANA and others
Amicus Curiae: CONSUMERS' RESEARCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
BATES et al v. STATE OF OHIO et al
as 1:2018mc00086
Respondent: ANNEKA P. COLLINS, JULIE A. HORNE, CLERK OF COURT and others
Petitioner: MAURA M. ROLL, MISTY C. BRICKLES, R. LOTUS JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
STATE OF ALABAMA et al v. PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION
as 1:2018cv00009
Plaintiff: STATE OF ALABAMA , STATE OF ALASKA , STATE OF ARIZONA and others
Defendant: PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GARZA v. HARGAN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv02122
Plaintiff: ROCHELLE GARZA
Defendant: ERIC HARGAN , STEPHEN WAGNER and SCOTT LLOYD
Movant: STATE OF TEXAS , STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF LOUISIANA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Matthew Grace, et al v. DC, et al
as 16-7067
Amicus Curiae: Everytown for Gun Safety, State of Montana, State of Hawaii and others
Defendant / Appellant: Peter Newsham, in his official capacity as Chief of Police for the Metropolitan Police Department, Cathy L. Lanier, in her official capacity as Chief of Police for the Metropolitan Police Department and District of Columbia
Plaintiff / Appellee: Matthew Grace and Pink Pistols
State of West Virginia, et al v. EPA, et al
as 17-1022
Petitioner: State of West Virginia, State of Texas, State of Alabama and others
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency and Catherine McCabe, Acting Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent: State of California, State of Connecticut, State of Delaware and others
STATE OF OHIO et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR et al
as 1:2017cv00108
Plaintiff: STATE OF OHIO , STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA , STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR , SALLY JEWELL, OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT and others
Movant: APPALACHIAN VOICES , CENTER FOR COALFIELD JUSTICE , COAL RIVER MOUNTAIN WATCH and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?