Cases 31 - 40 of 70
SCHAAP v. JUSTICE et al
as 1:2017cv02837
Plaintiff:
KEVIN SCHAAP
Defendant:
MELISSA F. JUSTICE, SHERI WITTMER, VIRGINIA BURDON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
STILL v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR et al
as 1:2017cv01420
Plaintiff:
SUZANNE STILL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
BALFOUR v. HERMAN
as 1:2017cv00033
Plaintiff:
RHONDA GRANT BALFOUR
Defendant:
KELLY SUZANNE HERMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02227
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Eva Maze, et al v. IRS, et al
as 16-5265
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Eva Maze, Suzanne Batra, Margot Lichtenstein and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Internal Revenue Service, Internal Revenue Service Office of the Commissioner, United States of America and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01382
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
ROGERS v. WINTER
as 1:2016cv00954
Plaintiff:
DARRELL ROGERS
Defendant:
SUZANNE WINTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Melvin Brown v. Sandra Hill, et al
as 16-7059
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Melvin Brown
Defendant - Appellee:
Sandra Hill, Randy Raybon, Suzanne Bond, CAO and others
MAZE et al v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE et al
as 1:2015cv01806
Plaintiff:
EVA MAZE , SUZANNE BATRA and MARGOT LICHTENSTEIN
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
BOVA et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2015cv01074
Plaintiff:
STEVEN P. BOVA , RICHIE BAKER , CORA FRYE and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN and IRANIAN MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1602
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
