Cases 41 - 50 of 3,468
MANYAN et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2023cv03192
Plaintiff:
RADCLIFFE MANYAN, SHERENE MANYAN and DAVID B. HARRIS, Jr.
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, JESSE PORTER, Jr., PORTER CONSULTING AND EXPERT TACTICAL TRAINING, LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
SEARCY v. VILSACK et al
as 1:2023cv03166
Plaintiff:
HENRY SEARCY, JR.
Defendant:
THOMAS J. VILSACK and JUSTIN MAXSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
USA, et al v. Ramiro Lozano, et al
as 23-7139
Plaintiff:
United States of America, ex rel. Terri R. Winnon and State of Texas, ex rel. Terri R. Winnon
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Terri R. Winnon
Defendant / Appellee:
Ramiro Lozano, also known as Ramiro G. Lozano, Jr., Jay W. Balentine, RJ Meridian Care Alta Vista, LLC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-7140
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lena Lindberg v. Bruce Assam, et al
as 23-7137
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lena Marie Lindberg
Defendant / Appellee:
Bruce Lee Assam, Vincent Albert Citro, Edward Melvin Fitzgerald and others
USA v. Anthony Glenmore, Jr.
as 23-3189
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Anthony Wayne Glenmore, Jr.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
THOMAS, JR. v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE et al
as 1:2023cv02732
Plaintiff:
LEMAR THOMAS, JR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and U.S. POSTAL SERVICE INSPECTOR GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MARTIN v. UNITED STATES
as 1:2023cv02758
Plaintiff:
ROWLAND J. MARTIN, JR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
USA v. William Calhoun, Jr.
as 23-3150
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
William McCall Calhoun, Jr.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
