Cases 41 - 50 of 77
Educational Assistance v. USA
as 14-5127
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Educational Assistance Foundation For The Descendants of Hungarian Immigrants In The Performing Arts, Inc., A Florida not-for-profit corporation
Movant - Appellant:
Barrett Weinberger, Co-Executors of the Estate of Julius Schaller and the entire Class of Beneficiaries of the Estate of Julius Schaller and Frances Odza, Co-Executors of the Estate of Julius Schaller and the entire Class of Beneficiaries of the Estate of Julius Schaller
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America
NB, et al v. DC, et al
as 14-7054
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NB, by her parent and next friend, Michelle Peacock, Michelle Peacock, Delilah Wynn and others
Defendant - Appellee:
District of Columbia, a municipal corporation, Vincent C. Gray, in his official capacity as Mayor of the District of Columbia and Wayne Turnage, in his official capacity as Director of the District of Columbia Department of Health Care Finance
Daniel Virtue v. International Brotherhood of T, et al
as 13-7194
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Daniel A. Virtue, for himself and a class of similarly situated persons
Defendant - Appellee:
International Brotherhood of Teamsters Retirement and Family Protection Plan, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Brad Slawson and others
Anthony Davis v. DC, et al
as 13-5327
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Anthony Leroy Davis
Defendant - Appellee:
District of Columbia, Dummy Corporation, Central Banking Class Corporations, Adjunct, Internal Revenue Service, Private Corporation, Adjunct and others
DAVIS v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2013cv01479
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEROY DAVIS
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, CENTRAL BANKING CLASS CORPORATIONS, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nasrin Mohammadi, et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran, et al
as 13-7109
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Nasrin Mohammadi, and Other Class Members, Manouchehr Mohammadi, Reza Mohammadi and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Islamic Republic of Iran, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Ayatollah Ali Hoseini Khamenei and others
ADAIR et al v. BUREAU OF CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION et al
as 1:2013cv01093
Plaintiff:
ERIK MODISETT , JOSUE E. MORENO , JORDON REIF and others
Defendant:
BUREAU OF CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
INGHAM REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER et al v. HAGEL
as 1:2013cv00417
Plaintiff:
INGHAM REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER , BAY REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER , MCLAREN NORTHERN MICHIGAN and others
Defendant:
CHARLES TIMOTHY HAGEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Manuel Garcia, et al v. Kathleen Sebelius, et al
as 13-5067
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Manuel Gudiel Garcia, As Heirs of CELSO RAMIREZ REYES, FEDERICO RAMOS MESA, MARTA CESAREA PEREZ RUIZ, VICTOR MANUEL TECU FLORIAN and Jane and John Does, all individually and on behalf of proposed Class Members, Gonzalo Ramirez Tista, As Heirs of CELSO RAMIREZ REYES, FEDERICO RAMOS MESA, MARTA CESAREA PEREZ RUIZ, VICTOR MANUEL TECU FLORIAN and Jane and John Does, all individually and on behalf of proposed Class Members, Victoria Ramirez Tista, As Heirs of CELSO RAMIREZ REYES, FEDERICO RAMOS MESA, MARTA CESAREA PEREZ RUIZ, VICTOR MANUEL TECU FLORIAN and Jane and John Does, all individually and on behalf of proposed Class Members and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (DHHS)(formerly Department of Health, Education and Welfare (HEW)), Howard K. Koh, M.D.,MPH, Assistant Secretary for Health U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (DHHS)(overseer of the U.S. Public Health Service (PHS)), Regina M. Benjamin, VICE ADMIRAL, M.D., Surgeon General, U.S. Public Health Service (PHS)) and others
CLASS v. BUCHANAN
as 1:2013cv00150
Plaintiff:
RODNEY DALE CLASS
Defendant:
BETH A. BUCHANAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
