Cases 41 - 50 of 3,637
IN RE ETHAN NORDEAN et al
as 1:2024mc00040
Not Yet Classified:
ETHAN NORDEAN
Petitioner:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
ADENARIWO et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2024cv00856
Plaintiff:
ADE ADENARIWO, THERESA BROOKS, DENINE EDMONDS and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-7038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-7039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Harold Jean-Baptiste v. DOJ, et al
as 24-5020
Plaintiff:
Harold Jean-Baptiste
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States, Head of the United States Department of Justice. Named in his official capacity., Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
State of Oklahoma, et al v. EPA, et al
as 24-1059
Petitioner:
State of Oklahoma, State of West Virginia, State of Arkansas and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor:
State of California, State of Colorado, State of Connecticut and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00541
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Deon Colvin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, et al
as 24-7016
Plaintiff:
Deon D. Colvin
Defendant:
District of Columbia Court of Appeals, Joshua Deahl, Assoc. Judge, Roy W. McLeese, III, Assoc. Judge and others
SMITH v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2024cv00343
Plaintiff:
JAMIE DAVIS SMITH
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00769
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
