Cases 41 - 50 of 53
MATTHEWS v. SHINSEKI
as 1:2010cv00431
Plaintiff:
ROBERT R. MATTHEWS
Defendant:
ERIC K. SHINSEKI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-5424
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Morris Peavey v. Eric Holder, Jr., et al
as 09-5389
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Morris J. Peavey
Defendant - Appellee:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., U.S. Attorney General, Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Timothy F. Geithner, Secretary, U.S. Department of the Treasury and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01837
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-5302
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
ESTATE OF WILBERT FLETCHER, JR et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2009cv01010
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF WILBERT FLETCHER, JR, WILBERT FLETCHER, III, WILBERT FLETCHER, SR and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ERIC K. SHINSEKI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
SPIEGEL et al v. SHINSEKI et al
as 1:2009cv00845
Plaintiff:
ALLAN M. SPIEGEL, JULIEN MODICA and HEALING HEROES NETWORK
Defendant:
ERIC K. SHINSEKI and ROBERT M. GATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
