Cases 41 - 50 of 123
SCHAAP v. JUSTICE et al
as 1:2017cv02837
Plaintiff:
KEVIN SCHAAP
Defendant:
MELISSA F. JUSTICE, SHERI WITTMER, VIRGINIA BURDON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
RANDALL v. MNUCHIN
as 1:2017mc03180
Petitioner:
CHARLES RANDALL
Respondent:
STEVEN TERNER MNUCHIN
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
BERGERUD v. BLANCO et al
as 1:2017cv02623
Plaintiff:
RANDALL R. BERGERUD
Defendant:
KENNETH A BLANCO, LARRY KUOERS and JEFF SESSIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RANDALL v. MNUCHIN
as 1:2017mc02762
Petitioner:
CHARLES RANDALL
Respondent:
STEVEN TERNER MNUCHIN
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
SCOT v. TRUMP
as 1:2017mc02764
Plaintiff:
RANDAL SCOT
Defendant:
DONALD JOHN TRUMP
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
TOLLEFSON et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2017cv01726
Plaintiff:
WALTER TOLLEFSON , MARY STEINMAN , JESSICA MECKLENBURG and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
Aror O'Diah v. Richard Cordray, et al
as 17-5170
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Aror Ark O'diah
Defendant - Appellee:
Richard Cordray, Director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, JPMorgan Chase & Co., also known as JPMorgan Chase Corporate, also known as Chase Bank and others
Rose Duru v. Karen Mitchell, et al
as 17-5162
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Rose Adanma Duru
Defendant - Appellee:
Karen Mitchell, DOJ/OIG/HHS - Northern District of Atlanta Georgia, Miller, "Agent" and others
In re: Randall Townsend
as 17-7113
In Re - Petitioner:
In re: Randall C. Townsend, Individually, and as natural Parent and lawfully as Guardian, and next friend of J.D.T. and J.G.T.
O'DIAH v. CORDRAY et al
as 1:2017cv00966
Plaintiff:
AROR ARK O'DIAH
Defendant:
RICHARD CORDRAY, CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, JP MORGAN CHASE & CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
