Cases 41 - 50 of 216
TRINKA v. MCDONOUGH et al
as 1:2021cv02904
Plaintiff:
JAMES TRINKA
Defendant:
DENIS R. MCDONOUGH, DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, DENIS MCDONOUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Perioperative Services And Logistics, LLC v. DVA
as 21-5223
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Perioperative Services and Logistics, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02579
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02845
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
AMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY FOUNDATION v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
as 1:2021cv01954
Plaintiff:
AMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY FOUNDATION
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
HOOKER v. DEPARTMENT OF VETERAN AFFAIRS
as 1:2021cv01691
Plaintiff:
CARLTON JR. HOOKER and CARLTON HOOKER, JR.
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF VETERAN AFFAIRS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Watkins Law & Advocacy, PLLC v. DOJ, et al
as 21-5108
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Department of Justice, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Watkins Law & Advocacy, PLLC
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MINORITY VETERANS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
as 1:2021cv01298
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MINORITY VETERANS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01064
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00381
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
