Cases 41 - 48 of 48
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. et al
as 1:2008cv00993
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and STATE OF VERMONT
Defendant:
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. and RURAL CELLULAR CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01494
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal- Civil Rights
PAETEC COMMUNICATIONS INC v. VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC.
as 1:2007cv00631
Plaintiff:
PAETEC COMMUNICATIONS INC
Defendant:
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
SHEA et al v. VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
as 1:2007cv00111
Defendant:
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
IN RE: LONG-DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICE FEDERAL EXCISE TAX REFUND LITIGATION - MDL 1798
as 1:2007mc00014
Plaintiff:
OSCAR GURROLA, OSCAR GURROLA, OSCAR GURROLA and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Vonage Hold Corp v. FCC, et al
as 06-1276
Petitioner:
Vonage Holdings Corporation
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Intervenor:
Verizon Communications Inc., Qwest Communications International Inc. and National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates
Intervenor For Petitioner:
The Voice on the Net Coalition
Qwest Svcs Corp v. FCC, et al
as 06-1274
Petitioner:
Qwest Services Corporation
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Intervenor:
Verizon Communications Inc., American Public Communications Council, AT&T Corporation and others
MCI WrldCom Ntwrk, et al v. FCC, et al
as 00-1406
Petitioner:
MCImetro Access Transmission Services LLC and MCI Worldcom Network Services, Inc.
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Intervenor:
Verizon Communications Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
