Cases 41 - 50 of 59
Jordan Louie, et al v. Michael Huerta, et al
as 13-1285
Petitioner:
Jordan Louie, Janice Louie, Bob Board and others
Respondent:
Michael P. Huerta and Federal Aviation Administration
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
Paulding County Airport Authority
THOMAS v. WILKINS et al
as 1:2013cv01590
Plaintiff:
HOMER THOMAS
Defendant:
ROBERT WILKINS and TERRI BARRETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CALDWELL v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2013cv01438
Plaintiff:
KEITH R. CALDWELL, SR.
Defendant:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, JOHN ROBERTS, ELANA KAGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEARSON et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2012cv01737
Plaintiff:
ANNETTE PEARSON , J. P. , CLEO MOSLEY and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
MISU v. WILKINS
as 1:2012cv00945
Plaintiff:
TIRA MISU
Defendant:
ROBERT WILKINS and NICHOLAS GARAFIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHAVEZ et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2012cv00359
Plaintiff:
ANA CHAVEZ , KATHY CANNON , ROBIN BELL and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
WILKINS v. HILLANDALE FARMS EAST, INC. et al
as 1:2011cv01773
Plaintiff:
QUEEN WILKINS
Defendant:
HILLANDALE FARMS EAST, INC. and HOWARD D. BLACK, SR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RODRIGUEZ et al v. SHULMAN et al
as 1:2011cv01183
Plaintiff:
IRENE D. RODRIGUEZ and ISIDORO RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
DOUGLAS SHULMAN, WILLIAM J. WILKINS, DEBORAH A. BUTLER and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
COPEMANN v. FUNDENBURG et al
as 1:2010cv01829
Plaintiff:
DALE A. COPEMANN
Defendant:
BRAIN FUNDENBURG and EDWARD D. WILKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00562
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
