Cases 51 - 60 of 108
ANDELA v. USA/U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
as 1:2015cv00645
Plaintiff:
VALENTINE B. ANDELA
Defendant:
USA/U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRIGAN v. YANG et al
as 1:2015cv00511
Plaintiff:
CLARE HARRIGAN
Defendant:
JENNY R. YANG and UNITED STATES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Case New Holland Industrial, I, et al v. EEOC, et al
as 14-5291
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Case New Holland Industrial, Inc. and CNH Industrial America LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and Chetan Patel
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-7154
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
TAY v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2014cv01109
Plaintiff:
TAY
Defendant:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Valentine Andela v. EEOC
as 14-1127
Petitioner:
Valentine B. Andela
Respondent:
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
MCCAIN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2014cv00565
Plaintiff:
ZACK MCCAIN, III
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CORRECTION CORPORATION OF AMERICA, EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01958
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Viol. of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
CASE NEW HOLLAND, INC. et al v. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION et al
as 1:2013cv01176
Plaintiff:
CASE NEW HOLLAND, INC. and CNH AMERICA LLC
Defendant:
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION and CHETAN PATEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
