Cases 51 - 60 of 5,448
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00662
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
IN RE JOHN EARLE SULLIVAN
as 1:2024mc00056
Not Yet Classified:
JOHN EARLE SULLIVAN
Petitioner:
PRESS COALITION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-7038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-7039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Center for Biological Diversity, et al v. Michael Regan, et al
as 24-5101
Plaintiff:
Center for Biological Diversity, Defenders of Wildlife, Sierra Club and others
Defendant:
Michael S. Regan, in his official capacity as Administrator for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Protection Agency, Radhika Fox, in her official capacity as Assistant Administrator for the Office of Water of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and others
Intervenor:
Tarpon Blue Silver King I, LLC, doing business as Collier Enterprises, Ltd., State of Florida and Florida Department of Environmental Protection
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC v. DOE
as 1:2024cv01166
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC v. DOE
as 1:2024cv01165
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Hodings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
