Cases 51 - 60 of 69
LOVE v. BLUEFIN, INC. et al
as 1:2009cv01880
Plaintiff:
DEBBIE LOVE
Defendant:
BLUEFIN, INC. and EDWARD HAHM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
SEC v. BILZERIAN, et al
as 1:1989cv01854
Plaintiff:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
PAUL A. BILZERIAN and ERNEST B. HAIRE
Receiver:
DEBORAH MESHULAM
Movant:
SHAW PITTMAN , TERRI L. STEFFEN , OVERSEAS HOLDING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP and others
Intervenor:
ADAM BILZERIAN and GARY MARININ
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-5121
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
LOVE v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION et al
as 1:2008cv01802
Plaintiff:
TREVIS ORLANDO LOVE
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS and DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Rosemary Love v. Thomas Vilsack
as 08-5135
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Rosemary Love, Lind Marie Bara-Weaver, Margaret Odom and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Ed Schafer and Thomas J. Vilsack
In Re: Love, et al
as 08-8004
In Re - Petitioner:
In re: Rosemary Love, Lind Marie Bara-Weaver, Margaret Odom and others
:
USA v. Allen Love
as 07-3140
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Allen G. Love
LEHMANN et al v. MERCK & CO., INC.
as 1:2007cv02272
Plaintiff:
DIANA LEHMANN, RUSS LEHMANN, LYNNETTE LEMON and others
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Loving, Dwight v. DOD, et al
as 07-5318
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Dwight Loving
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of Defense and Department of the Army
LOVE v. ZIEGLER et al
as 1:2007cv01314
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL P. LOVE
Defendant:
ZIEGLER and THERESA CARTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
