Cases 61 - 70 of 764
HEJAZI v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE et al
as 1:2023cv03334
Plaintiff:
FARZAD HEJAZI
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, ANTONY J. BLINKEN, MERRICK B. GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
POP v. MAYORKAS et al
as 1:2023cv03324
Plaintiff:
DAN A POP
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU and MERRICK B. GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
FALTES v. MAYORKAS et al
as 1:2023cv03266
Plaintiff:
SHADI FALTES
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU, TED H. KIM and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03255
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03243
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03230
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03245
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
PATEL v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2023cv03215
Plaintiff:
RAJ K. PATEL
Defendant:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ADAIR FORD BOROUGHS, KAMALA D. HARRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
