Cases 71 - 80 of 88
William Parker v. National Railroad Passenger C
as 16-7136
Plaintiff - Appellant:
William Parker
Defendant - Appellee:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation, d/b/a AMTRAK
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02125
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
HANSON v. AMTRAK OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL
as 1:2016mc00977
Plaintiff:
POLLY HANSON
Defendant:
AMTRAK OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL
Cause Of Action: MS:MiscOrd
National Railroad Passenger C v. Fraternal Order of Police, et al
as 16-7004
Plaintiff - Appellee:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation, doing business as Amtrak, also known as Chicago Union Station Company, also known as Passenger Railroad Insurance Limited, also known as Penn Station Leasing, LLC, also known as Washington Terminal Company, also kn
Defendant - Appellant:
Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge 189 Labor Committee
Defendant - Appellee:
Sarah Bryant
HOBSON v. AMTRAK CORPORATION
as 1:2016cv00017
Plaintiff:
SINALOA HOBSON
Defendant:
AMTRAK CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WRIGHT v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION et al
as 1:2015cv02021
Plaintiff:
WANDA J. WRIGHT
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION and AMTRAK POLICE FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE NEW JERSEY LODGE 189
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fiberlight, LLC v. National Railroad Passenger C, et al
as 15-7032
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Fiberlight, LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation, doing business as Amtrak and TW Telecom of DC LLC
ARMSTRONG v. AMTRAK
as 1:2015cv00440
Defendant:
AMTRAK
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH E. ARMSTRONG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-7051
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
