Cases 1 - 10 of 3,158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
TAYLOR v. ROBERTS et al
as 1:2024cv01643
Plaintiff:
CHARMAIN TAYLOR
Defendant:
TARIQUE ROBERTS and JOHN DOE
ENDO PAR INNOVATION COMPANY, LLC et al v. BECERRA et al
as 1:2024cv00999
Plaintiff:
ENDO PAR INNOVATION COMPANY, LLC, PAR PHARMACEUTICAL, INC., PAR STERILE PRODUCTS, LLC and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA, ROBERT M. CALIFF, M.D., UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION and others
Intervenor:
BPI LABS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
SUN PHARMA ADVANCED RESEARCH COMPANY, LTD., et al v. BECERRA et al
as 1:2024cv00946
Plaintiff:
SUN PHARMA ADVANCED RESEARCH COMPANY, LTD., and SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, INC.,
Not Yet Classified:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ROBERT CALIFF and U.S. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
ALKOUDMANI et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2024cv01588
Plaintiff:
RASHA ALKOUDMANI and NASSER SELO
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
USA v. Robert Miller
as 24-3071
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Robert Frank Miller, also known as Robert Franklin Miller
NEURELIS INC. v. CALIFF et al
as 1:2024cv01576
Plaintiff:
NEURELIS INC.
Defendant:
ROBERT M. CALIFF, in his official capacity as) Commissioner of Food and Drugs, U.S. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
