Cases 1 - 10 of 505
KRUGLYAK v. U.S. BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR NRZ PASS THROUGH TRUST II et al
as 1:2024cv01658
Plaintiff:
VLADIMIR R KRUGLYAK
Defendant:
U.S. BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR NRZ PASS THROUGH TRUST II, ARUNDINA LLC, ATLANTICA LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00868
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jeremy Pinson v. DOJ, et al
as 24-5010
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Pinson
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, Office of the Inspector General, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Brud Rossmann v. Linda Sapin, et al
as 24-5009
Plaintiff:
Brud Rossmann, Esquire
Defendant:
Linda Sapin, Ph.D, Philip Pulaski, MD, John Maxwell Finland and others
In re: Navy Chaplaincy
as 23-5283
In Re:
In re: Navy Chaplaincy
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Thomas Patrick Doney, as representative for Patrick Doney, Richard F. Hamme, Gary Heinke and others
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Navy, Carlos Del Toro, Secretary of the U.S. Navy, Rick Cheeseman, Vice Admiral, Chief of Naval Personnel and others
FLORES v. CITY OF MADISON et al
as 1:2023cv03276
Plaintiff:
VALERIE FLORES
Defendant:
CITY OF MADISON, CITY OF MADISON POLICE DEPARTMENT, SAMUEL KIRBY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-7141
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
