Cases 1 - 10 of 14
GALLARDO et al v. MAYORKAS et al
as 1:2021cv03375
Plaintiff:
JESY A. GALLARDO and ESTUARDO GALLARDO
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU and MERRICK B. GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
USA v. Stephon Jeter
as 21-3012
Defendant / Appellant:
Stephon Jeter, also known as Gallardo
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
GALLARDO v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2021cv00054
Defendant:
JARED KUSHNER, ROSALIND BURNS-SARGENT, WILLIAM BARR and others
Plaintiff:
GARRY DAULD GALLARDO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garry Gallardo v. Donald Trump, et al
as 20-5366
Defendant / Appellee:
Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, Rosalind Sargent-Burns, Pardon Attorney and Jared Kushner, President's Advisor
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Garry David Gallardo
Jesus Guillermo v. William Barr
as 20-1377
Respondent:
William P. Barr, Attorney General of the United States
Petitioner:
Jesus Gallardo Guillermo
JETER v. USA
as 1:2020cv01684
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
GALLARDO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Office of the Federal Public D, et al v. William Barr, et al
as 20-1144
Petitioner:
Office of the Federal Public Defender for the District of Arizona, Andre Leteve, Sammantha Allen and others
Respondent:
United States of America and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
GALLARDO v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2020cv00325
Defendant:
JARED KUSHNER, ROSALIND SARGENT-BURNS and DONALD J. TRUMP
Plaintiff:
GARRY DAVID GALLARDO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nathan Jacobs v. Dewayne Hendrix, et al
as 19-5128
Defendant / Appellee:
J. Crowder, W.B. Counselor, Dewayne Hendrix, Mr., Complex Warden, D. Gallardo, W-B Unit Manager and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Nathan E. Jacobs
JACOBS v. HENDRIX et al
as 1:2019cv00676
Defendant:
C. MARUKA, ROSALEZ, M. DANAHER and others
Plaintiff:
NATHAN E. JACOBS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
