Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Oscar Dantzler v. EEOC, et al
as 12-5060
Plaintiff - Appellant: Oscar Dantzler
Defendant - Appellee: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Keith Hills, Agent Does One-Five and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-5059
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-5006
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Montgomery Akers v. Harrell Watts, et al
as 10-5336
Plaintiff - Appellant: Montgomery Carl Akers
Defendant - Appellee: Harrell Watts, Nation Appeals Coordinator, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Michael Nalley, Regional Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons, R. Wiley, Warden, US Pentientiary-ADX, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00349
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv02147
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
DANTZLER v. UNITED STATES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv02149
Plaintiff: OSCAR DANTZLER
Defendant: UNITED STATES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, KEITH HILLS, AGENT DOES ONE-FIVE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Type: Other Statutes None
Montgomery Akers v. Harrell Watts, et al
as 09-5001
Plaintiff - Appellant: Montgomery Carl Akers
Defendant - Appellee: Harrell Watts, Nation Appeals Coordinator, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Michael Nalley, Regional Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons, R. Wiley, Warden, US Pentientiary-ADX, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?