Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv01505
Interested Party: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Momolu Sirleaf, Jr. v. Amor Correctional Health Serv, et al
as 20-7089
Defendant / Appellee: Harold W. Clarke, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, Eddie Pearson, Warden, GCC, Wright, Captain/Correctional Officer, GCC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Momolu V.S. Sirleaf, Jr., Pharaoh & Priest for the Commonwealth of Israel et al
SIRLEAF v. AMOR CORRECTIONAL HEALTH SERVICES, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv02522
Defendant: AMOR CORRECTIONAL HEALTH SERVICES, INC., HAROLD CLARKE, LYNDA BURROWS and others
Plaintiff: MOMOLU V.S. SIRLEAF, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Affinity Healthcare Services,, et al v. Kathleen Sebeliu
as 11-5037
Plaintiff - Appellee: Affinity Healthcare Services, Inc., doing business as Affinity Home Hospice Services, Americare Hospice & Palliative, Care, an Arizona non-profit corporation, Coastal Hospice Care, Inc. and others
Defendant - Appellant: Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of U. S. Department of Health and Human Services
Affinity Healthcare Services,, et al v. Kathleen Sebeliu
as 11-5038
Plaintiff - Appellant: Affinity Healthcare Services, Inc., doing business as Affinity Home Hospice Services, Americare Hospice & Palliative, Care, an Arizona non-profit corporation, Coastal Hospice Care, Inc. and others
Defendant - Appellee: Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of U. S. Department of Health and Human Services
AGAPE HOSPICECARE OF SHREVEPORT, LLC et al v. SEBELIUS
as 1:2011cv00234
Plaintiff: AGAPE HOSPICECARE OF SHREVEPORT, LLC, AGAPE NORTHEAST REGIONAL HOSPICE, LLC, AGAPE NORTHWEST REGIONAL HOSPICE, LLC and others
Defendant: KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Medical Care Recovery

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?