Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 18
POWERS v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00026
Plaintiff: ANN POWERS
Defendant: WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY, DEBBIE BUCKLER and REDUCED FARE PROGRAM FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
POWERS v. STATES OF MASSACHUSETTS
as 1:2008cv02221
Plaintiff: ANN POWERS
Defendant: STATES OF MASSACHUSETTS
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Civil Rights None
POWERS v. BUREAU OF ENGRAVING AND PRINTING
as 1:2008cv00451
Plaintiff: ANN POWERS
Defendant: BUREAU OF ENGRAVING AND PRINTING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv02352
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
POWERS v. MARKS et al
as 1:2007cv01946
Plaintiff: ANN POWERS
Defendant: MARKS and MIGUEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
POWERS v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
as 1:2007cv01594
Plaintiff: ANN POWERS
Defendant: INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
POWERS v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CLERK"S OFFICE
as 1:2007cv01029
Plaintiff: ANN POWERS
Defendant: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CLERK"S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
POWERS v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE et al
as 1:2007cv00953
Plaintiff: ANN POWERS
Defendant: INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, DENNIS PARIZEK and DENNIS L. PAIZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
POWERS v. CLINTON et al
as 1:2007cv00954
Plaintiff: ANN POWERS
Defendant: BILL CLINTON, HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON, GEORGE W. BUSH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
POWERS v. BRANBAGEN
as 1:2007cv00898
Plaintiff: ANN POWERS
Defendant: SUSAN BRANBAGEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?