Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Jacqueline Humphries v. Kurt Newman, et al
as 22-7043
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jacqueline R. Humphries, MD
Defendant / Appellee:
Kurt Newman, MD, President and Chief Executive Officer, Children's National Medical Center & Individual Capacity, Elizabeth Hardesty, Social Worker, Alexander Cheri Rucker, MD and others
HUMPHRIES v. NEWMAN et al
as 1:2018cv02936
Defendant:
ALEXANDER CHERI RUCKER, ASHLEY GARDELLA, KURT NEWMAN and others
Plaintiff:
JACQUELINE R. HUMPHRIES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TASEKO MINES LIMITED v. RAGING RIVER CAPITAL LP et al
as 1:2016cv00390
Defendant:
RAGING RIVER CAPITAL LP , RAGING RIVER CAPITAL GP LLC , GRANITE CREEK PARTNERS, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TASEKO MINES LIMITED
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
NextEra Desert Center Blythe v. FERC
as 16-1003
Petitioner:
NextEra Desert Center Blythe, LLC
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
California Independent System Operator Corporation
TAPLIN v. US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2013cv00102
Plaintiff:
BLYTHE TAPLIN
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
TAPLIN v. US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2012cv01815
Plaintiff:
BLYTHE TAPLIN
Defendant:
US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
AZ Corp Cmsn, et al v. FERC
as 03-1206
Petitioner:
Arizona Corporation Commission, Arizona Electric Power Cooperative, Inc., El Paso Electric Company and others
Terminated Party:
Arizona Gas Division of Citizens Communications Company
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor:
Arizona Public Service Company, Pinnacle West Energy Corporation, Pacific Gas and Electric Company and others
Intervenor For Petitioner:
Southwest Gas Corporation and BHP Copper Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
