Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03556
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Yvette Beaulieu v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 21-5183
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Yvette B. Beaulieu
Defendant / Appellee:
Merrick B. Garland, Mark Gross, James R. Clapper, Jr. and others
GRATION et al vs. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2021cv01859
Defendant:
IRANIAN MINISTRY OF INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY, ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, ISLAMIC REVOLUTIONARY GUARD CORPS and others
Plaintiff:
JUDITH ELLEN GRATION, JONATHAN SCOTT GRATION, JR., BARRY GORDON BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Ronald Byers v. Cmsnr. IRS
as 20-1052
Petitioner / Appellant:
Ronald E. Byers
Respondent / Appellee:
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
BATES et al v. DEWINE et al
as 1:2020cv00040
Respondent:
PAUL IRVING, BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM, MICHAEL R. PENCE and others
Petitioner:
R. LOTUS JUSTICE, RACHAEL N. PARKS, CLAYTON M. BATES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Steven Hall v. Chad F. Wolf, et al
as 19-5318
Defendant / Appellee:
Lisa Quiveors, Program Analyst, Chris Mills, Program Analyst, Tevesa Pohlman, Program Director and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Steven H. Hall
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01013
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
DONALDSON et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2017cv01206
Plaintiff:
JAMES DONALDSON , PEGGY DONALDSON , ADRIAN BUTLER and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
Ronald Byers v. United States Tax Court
as 16-5363
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ronald E. Byers
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Tax Court
BYERS v. UNITED STATES TAX COURT
as 1:2015cv01605
Plaintiff:
RONALD E. BYERS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES TAX COURT
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
