Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01035
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
James Roudabush, Jr. v. C. Samuel
as 16-5382
Plaintiff - Appellant: James Lester Roudabush, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee: C. E. Samuels
James Roudabush, Jr. v. C. Samuel
as 16-5301
Plaintiff - Appellant: James Lester Roudabush, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee: C. E. Samuels
James Roudabush, Jr. v. C. Dynan, et al
as 16-5290
Plaintiff - Appellant: James Lester Roudabush, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee: C. Dynan, Assistant Warden, J. Hollingsworth, Warden, C. E. Samuels, Director, F-BOP and others
James Roudabush v. C. Samuel
as 16-5106
Plaintiff - Appellant: James Lester Roudabush, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee: C. E. Samuels
ROUDABUSH v. DYNAN et al
as 1:2015cv01682
Plaintiff: JAMES LESTER ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant: C. DYNAN, J. HOLLINGSWORTH, C. E. SAMUELS, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROUDABUSH v. SAMUELS
as 1:2015cv01534
Plaintiff: JAMES LESTER ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant: C. E. SAMUELS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEARSON et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2012cv01737
Plaintiff: ANNETTE PEARSON , J. P. , CLEO MOSLEY and others
Defendant: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
C&E Services, Inc., et al v. Ashland, Inc.
as 09-7043
Plaintiff - Appellee: C&E Services, Inc. and Carl L. Biggs
Defendant - Appellant: Ashland, Inc.
C&E SERVICES OF WASHINGTON, INC. et al v. ASHLAND, INC. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2003cv01857
Plaintiff: C&E SERVICES, INC. and CARL L. BIGGS
Defendant: ASHLAND, INC.
Counter_claimant: ASHLAND, INC.
Counter_defendant: C&E SERVICES OF WASHINGTON, INC., C&E SERVICES, INC. and CARL L. BIGGS
Movant: SAMUEL J. GLASKER and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?