Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Abdul Mohammed v. Frank Easterbrook, et al
as 23-5293
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Abdul Azeem Mohammed
Defendant / Appellee:
Frank Easterbrook, Hon., Vanita Gupta, Merrick B. Garland and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03253
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
MOHAMMED v. EASTERBROOK et al
as 1:2023cv02003
Plaintiff:
ABDUL MOHAMMED
Defendant:
FRANK EASTERBROOK, VANITA GUPTA, MERRICK GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-5136
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
KIM et al v. DP CAPITAL LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01101
Plaintiff:
EUNG KWON KIM, KIM GEORGIA AVE, LLC and KIM GEORGIA AVE, LLC.
Defendant:
DP CAPITAL LLC., WCP FUND I LLC., WCP 4910 GEORGIA AVE NW LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
SHAH et al v. DP CAPITAL LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01102
Plaintiff:
SHAH INVESTMENT GROUP LLC. and NASIR A. SHAH
Defendant:
DP CAPITAL LLC., WCP FUND I LLC., WCP 4910 GEORGIA AVE NW LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00788
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act
POWELL v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
as 1:2021cv02838
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM E. POWELL
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, JANET YELLEN and CHARLES P. RETTIG
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
IOWASKA CHURCH OF HEALING v. RETTIG
as 1:2021cv02475
Plaintiff:
IOWASCA CHURCH OF HEALING and IOWASKA CHURCH OF HEALING
Defendant:
CHARLES P. RETTIG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
IRAZABAL et al v. PARET et al
as 1:2021mc00117
Defendant:
COLOMA RIVER HOLDINGS, LLC, CHARLES P. PARET, 201 KENNEDY STREET HOLDINGS, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MARIA DEL ROSARIO IRAZABAL and JULIO ANDRES IRAZABAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
