Cases 1 - 6 of 6
True the Vote, Inc. v. IRS, et al
as 23-5238
Plaintiff / Appellee:
True the Vote, Inc.
Defendant / Appellant:
Internal Revenue Service, United States of America, Steven T. Miller, In his official and Indivicual capacity as former Deputy Commissioner, Services & Enforcement, and Acting Commissioner, Internal Revenue Service and others
Interested Party:
Public Interest Legal Foundation, Inc., Bopp Law Firm, PC and Foley and Lardner, LLP
Iowaska Church of Healing v. Daniel Werfel, et al
as 23-5122
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Iowaska Church of Healing
Defendant / Appellee:
Daniel I. Werfel, in his Official Capacity as Commissioner, Internal Revenue Service and United States of America
Keith Caldwell, Sr. v. Barack Obama, et al
as 14-5085
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Keith Robert Caldwell, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Barack Hussein Obama, President of the United States, John Roberts, Chief Justice SCOTUS, Elena Kagan, Associate Justice SCOTUS and others
CALDWELL v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2013cv01438
Plaintiff:
KEITH R. CALDWELL, SR.
Defendant:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, JOHN ROBERTS, ELANA KAGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LINCHPINS OF LIBERTY et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2013cv00777
Plaintiff:
LINCHPINS OF LIBERTY , PATRIOTS EDUCATING CONCERNED AMERICANS NOW , GREENWICH TEA PARTY PATRIOTS OF SOUTH JERSEY, INC. and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, JACOB J. LEW and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE et al
as 1:2013cv00732
Plaintiff:
CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and DANIEL I. WERFEL
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
