Cases 1 - 10 of 10
GELIN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv03039
Plaintiff:
EDSON GELIN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
GELIN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv02855
Plaintiff:
EDSON GELIN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
ALTSCHULD et al v. RAIMONDO et al
as 1:2021cv02779
Plaintiff:
DAN ET AL ALTSCHULD, DAN ALTSCHULD, MARK S AMATO and others
Not Classified By Court:
LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III, MERRICK B. GARLAND, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and others
Defendant:
Secretary GINA M. RAIMONDO and GINA M. RAIMONDO
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2021cv02786
Plaintiff:
DAN ALTSCHULD, MARK S AMATO, Cynthia MATSUMOTO and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
PEARSON v. UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO
as 1:2019mc00170
Plaintiff:
THOMAS L. PEARSON
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO
Counter Defendant:
PEARSON FAMILY MEMBERS FOUNDATION
Not Yet Classified:
ANNE RICHARD and GARY EDSON
PATE v. MAZZANT et al
as 1:2018cv00699
Plaintiff:
FRANK EDWIN PATE
Defendant:
AMOS MAZZANT, III, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, DON BUSH and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
BOLAND et al v. EDSON MARSH CONSTRUCTION, INC.
as 1:2010cv00401
Plaintiff:
JAMES BOLAND , JOHN FLYNN , HENRY KRAMER and others
Defendant:
EDSON MARSH CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
FECHO et al v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al
as 1:2009cv02442
Plaintiff:
MICHELE FECHO, MICHELE FECHO, MICHELE FECHO and others
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, ABBOTT LABORATORIES, INC., BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KELI v. RICE et al
as 1:2007cv01697
Plaintiff:
HENRI KELI
Defendant:
CONDOLEEZA RICE, MAURA HARTY and STEPHEN A. EDSON
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Maritime Subsidy Board
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
