Cases 1 - 10 of 95
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03696
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
OLANREWAJU v. RUBIO et al
as 1:2026cv03039
Petitioner:
OBA TOLUWANIMI OLANREWAJU
Respondent:
JASON S. EVANS, JOHN A. SQUIRES, BRIAN PEARL and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
USA, et al v. Google LLC
as 26-5047
Plaintiff:
United States of America, State of Arkansas, State of Florida and others
Defendant:
Google LLC
Amicus Curiae:
Brave Software, Inc., Washington Legal Foundation, OpenAI OpCo, LLC and others
USA, et al v. Google LLC
as 26-5049
Plaintiff:
United States of America, State of Arkansas, State of Florida and others
Defendant:
Google LLC
Amicus Curiae:
Brave Software, Inc., Washington Legal Foundation, OpenAI OpCo, LLC and others
USA, et al v. Google LLC
as 26-5023
Plaintiff:
United States of America, State of Arkansas, State of Florida and others
Defendant:
Google LLC
Amicus Curiae:
Brave Software, Inc., Washington Legal Foundation, Mozilla Corporation and others
Marvin Knight v. District Rico Establishment
as 25-7193
Plaintiff:
Marvin Knight
Defendant:
District Rico Establishment
KNIGHT v. DISTRICT RICO ESTABLISHMENT
as 1:2025cv04212
Plaintiff:
MARVIN KNIGHT
Defendant:
DISTRICT RICO ESTABLISHMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KNIGHT v. DISTRICT RICO ESTABLISHMENT
as 1:2025cv04213
Plaintiff:
MARVIN KNIGHT
Defendant:
DISTRICT RICO ESTABLISHMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KNIGHT v. DISTRICT RICO ESTABLISHMENT
as 1:2025cv02910
Plaintiff:
MARVIN KNIGHT
Defendant:
DISTRICT RICO ESTABLISHMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PEREZ v. COLEMAN et al
as 1:2025cv02707
Defendant:
ALAN COLEMAN, SUSAN SCHAFFLER, SARAH HAYES and others
Plaintiff:
SHANIQUE PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
