Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Brud Rossmann v. Linda Sapin, et al
as 24-5009
Plaintiff:
Brud Rossmann, Esquire
Defendant:
Linda Sapin, Ph.D, Philip Pulaski, MD, John Maxwell Finland and others
ROSSMANN v. SAPIN et al
as 1:2023cv03123
Plaintiff:
BRUD ROSSMANN
Defendant:
LINDA SAPIN, PHILIP PULASKI, JOHN MAXWELL FINLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Allen Holeman v. SEC
as 19-1251
Respondent:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Petitioner:
Allen Holeman
Donetta Byrd v. Superior Court for the Distri, et al
as 15-7163
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Donetta Byrd
Defendant - Appellee:
Superior Court for the District of Columbia, Civil Division and Brian Holeman, Judge
BYRD v. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2015cv01949
Plaintiff:
DONETTA BYRD
Defendant:
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and BRIAN F. HOLEMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Stephen Becker v. Sheila Parham, et al
as 13-7040
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Stephen J. Becker
Defendant - Appellee:
Sheila N. Parham, Glenda Benns, Corneilous Parham and others
BECKER v. PARHAM et al
as 1:2013cv00152
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN J. BECKER
Defendant:
SHEILA N. PARHAM, GLENDA BENNS, CORNEILOUS PARHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jacqueline Robinson-Reeder v. Christine Kearns, et al
as 11-5356
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jacqueline T. Robinson-Reeder
Defendant - Appellee:
Christine N. Kearns, Partner, Pillsbury Shaw Pittman Law Firm, John D. Bates, U.S. District Court, David B. Sentelle, Chief Judge, U.S. District Court of Appeal and others
ROBINSON-REEDER v. KEARNS et al
as 1:2011cv00432
Plaintiff:
JACQUELINE T. ROBINSON-REEDER
Defendant:
CHRISTINE N. KEARNS , JOHN D. BATES, DAVID SENTELLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ziad Akl v. Brian Holeman, et al
as 10-7072
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ziad Akl, MD
Defendant - Appellee:
Brian Holeman, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, LLP, Patrick J. Potter and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
