Cases 1 - 6 of 6
GALLON HENAO v. MNUCHIN et al
as 1:2018cv00052
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, OFFICE OF FOREIGN ASSETS CONTROL, STEVEN T. MNUCHIN and JOHN E. SMITH
Plaintiff:
PEDRO DAVID GALLON HENAO
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Abdul Waked Fares, et al v. John Smith, et al
as 17-5075
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Abdul Mohamed Waked Fares, Mohamed Abdo Waked Darwich, Lucia Touzard Romo and others
Defendant - Appellee:
John E. Smith, in his official capacity as Acting Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control of the Department of the Treasury and Office of Foreign Assets Control of the United States Department of the Treasury
Richard Chichakli v. Donald Trump, et al
as 17-5052
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Richard A. Chichakli
Defendant - Appellee:
Donald J. Trump, President of the United States of America in his official capacity, Steven T. Mnuchin, Secretary of United States Treasury, and in his official capacity, Adam J. Szubin, As former director of Office of Foreign Assets Control, in his personal capacity and others
WAKED FARES et al v. SMITH et al
as 1:2016cv01730
Plaintiff:
ABDUL MOHAMED WAKED FARES , MOHAMED ABDO WAKED DARWICH , LUCIA TOUZARD ROMO and others
Defendant:
JOHN E. SMITH and OFFICE OF FOREIGN ASSETS CONTROL OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Fadhel Hentif, et al v. Barack Obama, et al
as 12-5314
Petitioner - Appellant:
Fadhel Hussein Saleh Hentif, Detainee and Haykal Mohammed Saleh Hentif, As next friend of Fadhel Hussein Saleh Hentif
Respondent - Appellee:
Barack Obama, President of the United States, Leon E. Panetta, Secretary United States Department of Defense, John W. Smith, Jr., Rear Adm. Commander Joint Task Force and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
