Cases 1 - 10 of 1,900
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
KHALEEL v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2024cv01802
Plaintiff:
ASIF N. KHALEEL
Defendant:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, RENA BITTER, ANDREW SCHOFER and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
KEARNEY v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2024cv01793
Plaintiff:
ERICA KEARNEY
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01130
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
ALI v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2024cv01722
Plaintiff:
JALIL ALI
Defendant:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, RENA BITTER, MATTHEW PALMER and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
SADIQ v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2024cv01693
Plaintiff:
REHAN SADIQ
Defendant:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, RENA BITTER, THATCHER SCHARPF and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
JERNIGAN et al v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2024cv01666
Plaintiff:
LARIS BRITTON JERNIGAN, XUAN THI TRAN and NHAN QUANG BAO TRAN
Defendant:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, RENA BITTER, SUSAN BURNS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
CAMIRE et al v. ALCOA USA CORP. et al
as 1:2024cv01062
Plaintiff:
MARTHA BRENNAN CAMIRE, CRAIG JEFFERSON, DAVID LYN SHEPHERD and others
Defendant:
ALCOA USA CORP., ALCOA CORP., ALCOA BENEFITS MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
TAYLOR v. ROBERTS et al
as 1:2024cv01643
Plaintiff:
CHARMAIN TAYLOR
Defendant:
TARIQUE ROBERTS and JOHN DOE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
