Cases 1 - 10 of 15
ST. JOHN et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2023cv02333
Defendant:
IRANIAN MINISTRY OF INTELLIGENCE & SECURITY, ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, ISLAMIC REVOLUTIONARY GUARD CORPS and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN BRYAN ST. JOHN, JOHN CHARLES YOUNG II, ESTATE OF JAMES ELLIOTT KEGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
FLORES et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2022cv01512
Plaintiff:
RUBEN V. FLORES, DELIA D. FLORES, JOSHUA D. FLORES and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN and SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
Vicente Quiroz v. John Moran, Jr., et al
as 17-5139
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Vicente Quiroz
Defendant - Appellee:
John Thomas Moran, Jr., United States of America and Public Defenders Office, Individually and their Official Capacities
QUIROZ v. MORAN et al
as 1:2017cv00886
Plaintiff:
VICENTE QUIROZ
Defendant:
JOHN THOMAS MORAN, JR., UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-7129
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-7128
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-7133
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-7134
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-7130
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
