Cases 1 - 10 of 176
ALAMEDA HEALTH SYSTEM et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2024cv01259
Plaintiff:
STANFORD HEALTH CARE, ALAMEDA HEALTH SYSTEM doing business as ALAMEDA HOSPITAL doing business as HIGHLAND HOSPITAL, CHINESE HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION doing business as CHINESE HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
FARM LABOR ORGANIZING COMMITTEE et al v. SU et al
as 1:2024cv00706
Plaintiff:
FARM LABOR ORGANIZING COMMITTEE, COMITE DE APOYO A LOS TRABAJADORES AGRICOLAS (CATA), SIN FRONTERAS ORGANIZING PROJECT and others
Defendant:
JULIE A. SU and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
GALEN HOSPITAL ALASKA, INC. et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
GALEN HOSPITAL ALASKA, INC. doing business as ALASKA REGIONAL HOSPITAL, RIVERSIDE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, L.P. doing business as RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, SAN JOSE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, L.P. doing business as REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
WHITMAN-WALKER CLINIC, INC. et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 1:2020cv01630
Plaintiff:
WARD CARPENTER, MD, AGLP: THE ASSOCIATION OF LGBTQ PSYCHIATRISTS, BRADBURY-SULLIVAN LGBT COMMUNITY CENTER and others
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II, SEEMA VERMA, ROGER SEVERINO and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Westmoreland Mining Holdings L v. EPA, et al
as 19-1176
Petitioner:
Westmoreland Mining Holdings LLC
Respondent:
Andrew Wheeler, Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Protection Agency and Jane Nishida, Acting Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency
Amicus Curiae:
City of Portland, Debra A. Haaland, Michael Oppenheimer and others
Intervenor:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Center for Biological Diversity, City of Boulder and others
VISCONTI v. BURGHARDT et al
as 1:2023cv03037
Plaintiff:
MAHA VISCONTI
Defendant:
JOSEPH BURGHARDT, JESUS BERNAL, SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
State of Ohio, et al v. EPA, et al
as 22-1081
Petitioner:
State of Ohio, State of Alabama, State of Arkansas and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, in his official capacity as Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor:
State of California, State of Colorado, State of Connecticut and others
Amicus Curiae:
The Two Hundred for Housing Equity, Americans for Tax Reform, American Commitment and others
Not Yet Classified:
ConservAmerica
State of West Virginia, et al v. EPA, et al
as 15-1399
Petitioner:
State of West Virginia, State of Texas, State of Alabama and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Regina A. McCarthy, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor:
Gulf Coast Lignite Coalition, Calpine Corporation, Lignite Energy Council and others
Amicus Curiae:
Technological Innovation Experts, Nicholas Ashford, M. Granger Morgan, Edward S. Rubin, and Margaret Taylor, Carbon Capture and Storage Scientists, Roger Aines, Sally Benson, S. Julio Friedmann, Jon Gibbins, Raghubir Gupta, Howard Herzog, Susan Hovorka, Meagan Mauter, Ah-Hyung (Alissa) Park, Gary Rochelle and Jennifer Wilcox and Saskatchew Power Corporation
VISCONTI v. BURGHARDT et al
as 1:2023cv03145
Plaintiff:
MAHA VISCONTI
Defendant:
JOSEPH BURGHARDT, JESUS BERNAL, SUPERIOR COURTS OF LOS ANGELES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. LOS ANGELES COUNTY FAIR ASSOCIATION
as 1:2023cv02729
Plaintiff:
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND and BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND
Defendant:
LOS ANGELES COUNTY FAIR ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
