Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Douglas Walburg v. FCC, et al
as 14-1243
Petitioner: Douglas P. Walburg
Respondent: Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Movant-Intervenor For Petitioner: Bais Yaakov of Spring Valley, Roger H. Kaye, Roger H. Kaye, MD PC and others
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent: Medical West Ballas Pharmacy, Ltd., Michael R. Nack and Richie Enterprises, LLC
Bais Yaakov of Spring Valley, et al v. FCC, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-1234
Petitioner: Bais Yaakov of Spring Valley, Roger H. Kaye, Roger H. Kaye, MD PC and others
Respondent: Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Movant-Intervenor For Petitioner: Bais Yaakov of Spring Valley, Roger H. Kaye, Roger H. Kaye, MD PC and others
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent: Medical West Ballas Pharmacy, Ltd., Michael R. Nack, Richie Enterprises, LLC and others
Richie Enterprises, LLC v. FCC, et al
as 14-1239
Petitioner: Richie Enterprises, LLC
Respondent: Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Movant-Intervenor For Petitioner: Bais Yaakov of Spring Valley, Roger H. Kaye, Roger H. Kaye, MD PC and others
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent: Medical West Ballas Pharmacy, Ltd., Michael R. Nack and Richie Enterprises, LLC
American Meat Institute, et al v. AGRI, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-5281
Plaintiff - Appellant: American Meat Institute, American Association of Meat Processors, Canadian Cattlemen's Association and others
Defendant - Appellee: United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service, Tom Vilsack, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture and others
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee: United States Cattlemen's Association, National Farmers Union, American Sheep Industry Association and others
AMERICAN MEAT INSTITUTE et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv01033
Plaintiff: AMERICAN MEAT INSTITUTE , AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF MEAT PROCESSORS , CANADIAN CATTLEMEN'S ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE , AGRICULTURAL MARKETING SERVICE , TOM VILSACK and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Grocery Manufacturers Assoc., et al v. EPA
as 11-1072
Petitioner: Grocery Manufacturers Association, American Frozen Food Institute, American Meat Institute and others
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency
Grocery Manufacturers Associat v. EPA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-1380
Petitioner: Grocery Manufacturers Association, American Frozen Food Institute, American Meat Institute and others
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency
National Chicken Council, et al v. EPA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-1107
Petitioner: National Chicken Council, National Meat Association and National Turkey Federation
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency
ABEDRABBO et al v. TOPPS MEAT COMPANY LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv01838
Plaintiff: FAHIM ABEDRABBO, MAUREEN BOYLE, FRANK INGRAM and others
Defendant: TOPPS MEAT COMPANY LLC, AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC., PRESERVER GROUP, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Type: Contract Plaintiff
Munsell, John W., et al v. AGRI, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 06-5261
Plaintiff - Appellant: John W. Munsell, Montana Quality Foods and Processing, Inc. and American Association of Meat Processors
Defendant - Appellee: United States Department of Agriculture, Michael O. Johanns, Secretary of Agriculture, in his official capacity only and Nathaniel Clark, in his individual capacity

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?