Cases 1 - 10 of 10
COMMON CAUSE et al v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2020cv02023
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, WILBUR L. ROSS, JR., CHERYL L. JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
ANDREA M. ALEXANDER, ROBERTO AGUIRRE, SHEILA AGUIRRE and others
Amicus Curiae:
LIBBY GARLAND, LUSH COSMETICS LLC, STEVEN RUGGLES and others
Petitioner:
ELIZABETH WARREN, IMMIGRATION REFORM LAW INSTITUTE and RON WYDEN
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. ยง 431 Fed. Election Commission: Failure Enforce C
Anne Arundel County, Maryland, et al v. FCC, et al
as 19-1225
Petitioner:
Wilmington, Delaware, Chevy Chase Village, Maryland, Minneapolis, MN and others
Respondent:
United States of America and Federal Communications Commission
Natl. Alliance of Forest Owner v. EPA, et al
as 15-1478
Petitioner:
National Alliance of Forest Owners
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Regina A. McCarthy, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Movant-Amicus Curiae For Respondent:
National League of Cities, United States Conference of Mayors, Baltimore, MD and others
The North American Coal Corp. v. EPA, et al
as 15-1451
Petitioner:
The North American Coal Corporation
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Regina A. McCarthy, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Amicus Curiae For Respondent:
Institute for Policy Integrity at New York University School of Law, National League of Cities, United States Conference of Mayors and others
Indiana Utility Group v. EPA, et al
as 15-1459
Petitioner:
Indiana Utility Group
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Regina A. McCarthy, Administrator, United States Environmental Agency
Amicus Curiae For Respondent:
Institute for Policy Integrity at New York University School of Law, National League of Cities, United States Conference of Mayors and others
The Kansas City Board v. EPA
as 15-1442
Petitioner:
The Kansas City Board of Public Utilities-- Unified Government of Wyandotte County/Kansas City, Kansas
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Amicus Curiae For Respondent:
Institute for Policy Integrity at New York University School of Law
Movant-Amicus Curiae For Respondent:
National League of Cities, United States Conference of Mayors, Baltimore, MD and others
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
City of Los Angeles, Department of Water and Power
State of Oklahoma, et al v. EPA
as 15-1364
Not Yet Classified:
Catholic Climate Covenant, ; Catholic Rural Life; Evangelical Environmental Network; National Council of Churches USA; Coalition on the Environment and Jewish Life; Church World Service; Union of Reform Judaism; Women of Reform Judaism; National Bapt, Don J. Easterbrook, Gordon J. Fulks and others
Amicus Curiae:
Municipal Electric Authority of Georgia, Loggers Association of Northern California, Boulder County, CO and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Petitioner:
Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality and State of Oklahoma, ex rel. Mike Hunter
City Of Moundridge, Kansas, et al v. Exxon Mobil Corporation, et al
as 09-7153
Plaintiff - Appellant:
City Of Moundridge, KS, City of Winfield, Kansas, City Of Coffeyville, KS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Exxon Mobil Corporation, Royal Dutch/Shell Group, ChevronTexaco Corp. and others
Albrecht, Anne, et al v. Com Empl Benefits, et al
as 02-5325
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Anne K. Albrecht, Lillian R. Alston, James August and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Committee on Employee Benefits of the Federal Reserve Employee Benefits System, Edward W. Kelley, In his capacity as Chairman of the Committee on Employee Benefits, Roger W. Ferguson, Jr., In his capacity as member of the Committee on Employee Benefits and others
Northpoint Technol, et al v. FCC
as 02-1194
Appellant - Appellant:
Northpoint Technology, Ltd., Broadwave USA, Inc., Broadwave Network, LLC and others
Appellee - Appellee:
Federal Communications Commission
Terminated Party:
SkyBridge L.L.C.
Intervenor:
EchoStar Satellite Corporation, Satellite Broadcasting and Communications Association, DIRECTV, Inc. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
