Cases 1 - 10 of 22
CHAVEZ et al v. VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC.
as 1:2024cv02051
Plaintiff:
EVER LOVO, DOUGLAS CHAVEZ and BRIAN MONTESINOS
Defendant:
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC., VERIZON SOURCING LLC and RAYMOND ODOM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
WARE v. GOLDEN DIVERSITY, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv03618
Plaintiff:
JENIYAH WARE
Defendant:
GOLDEN DIVERSITY, INC., PATRICIA BROWN and TERI ODOM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
ADESHINA v. BUSH et al
as 1:2022cv00906
Plaintiff:
YINKA ADESHINA
Defendant:
GEORGE W. BUSH, BILL J. CLINTON, ELON MUSK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ODOM v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2021cv03074
Plaintiff:
Tony Odom
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Yvette Beaulieu v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 21-5183
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Yvette B. Beaulieu
Defendant / Appellee:
Merrick B. Garland, Mark Gross, James R. Clapper, Jr. and others
Mark Crawford, et al v. Jeffrey Rosen
as 20-5355
Defendant / Appellee:
William P. Barr, U.S. Attorney General and Jeffrey Rosen, Acting U.S. Attorney General
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Melissa Matthews, Nelson Rhone, Durand L. Odom and others
ODOM v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv02051
Plaintiff:
TIANA MARIE ODOM
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Jaunice Odom, et al v. DC, et al
as 19-7125
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Malachi Urquhart
Defendant / Appellee:
Joseph A. Hudson, Officer and District of Columbia
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jaunice Odom
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00440
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00798
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
