Cases 1 - 10 of 117
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01262
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00865
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00832
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00734
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
In re: Navy Chaplaincy
as 23-5283
In Re:
In re: Navy Chaplaincy
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Thomas Patrick Doney, as representative for Patrick Doney, Richard F. Hamme, Gary Heinke and others
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Navy, Carlos Del Toro, Secretary of the U.S. Navy, Rick Cheeseman, Vice Admiral, Chief of Naval Personnel and others
Barbara Palmer v. FEC
as 23-5216
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Barbara W. Palmer
Defendant / Appellee:
Federal Election Commission
Trenton Palmer v. FAA
as 23-1239
Petitioner:
Trenton Palmer
Respondent:
Federal Aviation Administration, Administrator and National Transportation Safety Board
EVANS v. CURRIE et al
as 1:2023cv02593
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH EVANS
Defendant:
CURRIE, LEILA PALMER and DOCTOR POWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02208
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
