Cases 1 - 10 of 3,043
HTET v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2024cv01446
Plaintiff:
Theint Win Htet
Defendant:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JANET YELLEN, BRADLEY T. SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
WILGUS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE et al
as 1:2024cv01384
Plaintiff:
JAMES VINCENT WILGUS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, JOSEPH R. BIDEN, ANTHONY J. BLINKEN and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
HARO v. STARK
as 1:2024cv01294
Plaintiff:
ABIGAIL HARO
Defendant:
ALAN M. STARK
Cross Defendant:
KEVIN B. PIERCY, TAYLOR R. EALAND, JAMES D. MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HENRY v. ROBERTS et al
as 1:2024cv01276
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL F. HENRY
Defendant:
JOHN ROBERTS, MARY JANE THEIS, DIANE SYKES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BUCKNER et al v. PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF ROBERT E. MURRAY et al
as 1:2024cv01268
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL W. BUCKNER and JOSEPH R. RESCHINI
Defendant:
PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF ROBERT E. MURRAY, BRENDA LOU MURRAY, CHAGRIN EXECUTIVE OFFICES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Matthew Logan v. SEC
as 24-1095
Petitioner:
Matthew R. Logan
Respondent:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Xiu Sun v. Joseph Biden, Jr.
as 24-5079
Plaintiff:
Xiu Jian Sun, Servant , The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., President of U.S.A.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-7038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-7039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
DEHGHAN et al v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2024cv00851
Plaintiff:
MOHAMMAD R. DEHGHAN and PADIDEH DEHGHAN
Defendant:
ANTHONY J. BLINKEN, MORA NAMDAR and SCOTT M. OUDKIRK
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
