Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
D'rayfield Shipman v. Amtrak
as 20-7006
Defendant / Appellee:
Amtrak
Plaintiff / Appellant:
D'Rayfield Kary-Khame Shipman
SHIPMAN v. AMTRAK
as 1:2019cv00004
Plaintiff:
DRAYFIELD KARY-KLAME SHIPMAN
Defendant:
AMTRAK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHIPMAN v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
as 1:2018cv01960
Defendant:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
Plaintiff:
D-RAYFIELD KARY-KHAME SHIPMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHIPMAN v. CLERK'S OFFICE OF THE U.S. SUPREME COURT
as 1:2018cv01959
Defendant:
CLERK'S OFFICE OF THE U.S. SUPREME COURT
Plaintiff:
D-RAYFIELD KARY-KHAME SHIPMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dayshawn Ingram v. Michael Shipman-Meyer, et al
as 17-7074
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Dayshawn Ingram, Individually and as a personal representative of the estate of Anthony Chambers and as legal representative of A.L., a minor
Defendant - Appellant:
Michael Shipman-Meyer, Metropolitan Police Department, Stephen Rose, Metropolitan Police Department, Elizabeth Laducca, Metropolitan Police Department and others
Defendant - Appellee:
District of Columbia, A Municipal Corporation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-5066
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
D'Rayfield Shipman v. Disabled American Veteran
as 15-7059
Plaintiff - Appellant:
D'Rayfield Shipman
Defendant - Appellee:
Disabled American Veterans
SHIPMAN v. DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS
as 1:2015cv00871
Plaintiff:
D'RAYFIELD SHIPMAN
Defendant:
DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00384
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
