Cases 1 - 5 of 5
ROBINSON et al v. FARLEY et al
as 1:2015cv00803
Defendant:
BRANDON CARL FARLEY, BABCOCK, THOMAS HILLIGOSS and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL EUGENE ROBINSON and AGNES JOYCE ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2010cv01233
Plaintiff:
SHEILA T. DAVIS
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA , B. A. COVER and UNKNOWN AND UNIDENTIFIED OFFICERS OF D.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
MARTIN v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2009cv01241
Plaintiff:
ANTOINE MARTIN
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, ALFONSO MATOS and UNKNOWN AND UNIDENTIFIED OFFICERS OF THE D.C. METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jeffrey Barham v. Kenneth Salazar
as 07-5305
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Jeffrey Barham, Mary Canales, William Durham and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Dirk Kempthorne, Secretary, Department of Interior, Kenneth Lee Salazar, Secretary, Department of Interior, Michael B. Mukasey, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Charles H. Ramsey, in his individual and personal capacity only, Cathy L. Lanier, District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Chief, in her official capacity, District of Columbia and others
Barham, Jeffrey, et al v. Ramsey, Charles H., et al
as 04-5388
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Jeffrey Barham, Mary Canales, William Durham and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Charles H. Ramsey, In his individual capacity and in his official capacity as Chief of Police, MPD
Defendant - Appellee:
District of Columbia, District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department, Anthony A. Williams, In his Individual capacity and in his official capacity as Mayor and others
Defendant - Terminated Party:
John D. Ashcroft, In his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
