Cases 1 - 10 of 29
LEWICKI et al v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
as 1:2024cv02505
Defendant:
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
Plaintiff:
DAVID LEWICKI and VLADIMIR SHKLOVSKY
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 431 Fed. Election Commission: Failure Enforce C
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02380
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
STRESHINSKIY et al v. SMITH et al
as 1:2024cv01601
Plaintiff:
Vladimir Yakovlevich Streshinskiy and Natalia Alexevvna Streshinskaya
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, OFFICE OF FOREIGN ASSETS CONTROL and BRADLEY T. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
VASQUEZ v. WORMUTH
as 1:2024cv01373
Defendant:
Vladimir S. Vasquez and CHRISTINE E. WORMUTH
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
SIVOV v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2024cv00687
Plaintiff:
VLADIMIR SIVOV
Defendant:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, RENA BITTER, JOHN GINKEL and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Denys Namystiuk v. Russian Federation, et al
as 22-7170
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Denys Namystiuk
Defendant / Appellee:
Russian Federation and Vladimir Putin, Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Russian Federation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03695
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
WATZKE v. WATZKE et al
as 1:2022cv02803
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS WATZKE
Defendant:
CHARLES WATZKE, VLADIMIR VLADIMIROVICH PUTIN and BIDEN
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-5120
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
ESKIN v. AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK
as 1:2022cv00820
Plaintiff:
Vladimir Eskin
Defendant:
African Development Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
