Cases 1 - 10 of 2,006
Jerome Johnson v. Carlos Del Toro
as 24-5128
Plaintiff:
Jerome W. Johnson
Defendant:
Carlos Del Toro, Secretary, U.S. Department of Navy
Susan Seltzer v. Michael Lieder, et al
as 24-7071
Plaintiff:
Susan Seltzer
Defendant:
Michael David Lieder, Ameriprise, formerly known as American Express Financial Advisors, Inc., Edward B. Magarian and others
MATHIS et al v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2024cv01312
Plaintiff:
W. MATHIS and K. DAVIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, PATRICIA K. CUSHWA, COURT SERVICES AND OFFENDER SUPERVISION AGENCY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794 Rehabilitation Act
STURM v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
as 1:2024cv01298
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW W. STURM
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01339
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act
HENRY v. ROBERTS et al
as 1:2024cv01276
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL F. HENRY
Defendant:
JOHN ROBERTS, MARY JANE THEIS, DIANE SYKES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BUCKNER et al v. PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF ROBERT E. MURRAY et al
as 1:2024cv01268
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL W. BUCKNER and JOSEPH R. RESCHINI
Defendant:
PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF ROBERT E. MURRAY, BRENDA LOU MURRAY, CHAGRIN EXECUTIVE OFFICES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-7038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-7039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
COURTHOUSE NEWS SERVICE v. DEMPSON
as 1:2024cv00726
Plaintiff:
COURTHOUSE NEWS SERVICE
Defendant:
ZABRINA W. DEMPSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
