Cases 1 - 10 of 141
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5143
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01529
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01480
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
PALINOLA AESTHETICS LLC. v. MARLBORO VILLAGE LLC. et al
as 1:2024mc00061
Plaintiff:
PALINOLA AESTHETICS LLC.
Defendant:
MARLBORO VILLAGE LLC., PIN CHEN, YUN MING CHEN and others
KANDI BAR, LLC v. SHENZHEN XIANGSHA NETWORK TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. et al
as 1:2024cv01393
Plaintiff:
KANDI BAR LLC
Defendant:
SHENZHEN XIANGSHA NETWORK TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD and CHEN XIAOLI
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Yanping Chen v. FBI, et al
as 24-5050
Plaintiff:
Yanping Chen
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, United States Department of Justice, United States Department of Defense and others
Appellant:
Catherine Herridge
Aror-Ark O'Diah v. John Roberts, et al
as 24-5074
Plaintiff:
Aror-ark Ark O'diah
Defendant:
John G. Roberts, Chief Justice, United States Small Business Administration, also known as United States Small Business Administration, SBA, Isabella Casillas Guzman, SBA Administrator and others
Charles Turpin, et al v. DC, et al
as 24-7064
Plaintiff:
Charles Turpin and Regina Jackson
Defendant:
District of Columbia, a municipal corporation and Michael Chen, Officer, in his individual capacity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00819
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
