Cases 1 - 10 of 57,432
AGDIPA v. ERTAY et al
as 1:2024cv01491
Plaintiff:
SHARON THOMAS AGDIPA
Defendant:
ANIL OZGE ERTAY and HUSNU SINAN ERTAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01490
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01494
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
ALIEV et al v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2024cv01495
Plaintiff:
MURAT MAGOMEDOVICH ALIEV, BONUM CAPITAL (CYPRUS) LTD, LIMTED LIABILITY COMPANY BONUM CAPITAL and others
Defendant:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, JANET YELLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
CSOKA v. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2024cv01486
Plaintiff:
ANTONEI B. CSOKA
Defendant:
FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
BLOOMBERG L.P. v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
as 1:2024cv01488
Plaintiff:
BLOOMBERG L.P.
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
PROTECT THE PUBLIC'S TRUST v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
as 1:2024cv01487
Plaintiff:
PROTECT THE PUBLIC'S TRUST
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
BAI v. MAYORKAS et al
as 1:2024cv01489
Plaintiff:
WEI BAI
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU and MERRICK B. GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Klein
as 1:2024cv01484
Petitioner:
Henry L. Klein
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1905 Disclosure of Confidential Information
v. Klein
as 1:2024cv01485
Defendant:
Henry L. Klein
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
