Cases 1 - 10 of 170
Simpkins v. OPM
as 24-1921
Petitioner:
EDWARD J. SIMPKINS
Respondent:
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
Apple Inc. v. Vidal
as 24-1864
Plaintiff:
APPLE INC., CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., GOOGLE LLC and others
Defendant:
KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Knighten v. US
as 24-1563
Plaintiff:
FRANK E. KNIGHTEN, JR. and FRANK EDWARD KNIGHTEN, JR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
In re: Cahill
as 24-1745
Appellant:
In re: BRET EDWARD CAHILL
Defendant / Appellee:
KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Edwards v. SSA
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 24-1410
Plaintiff:
HAROLD L. EDWARDS, JR.
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Neister v. Eden Park Illumination, Inc.
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 24-1374
Appellant:
S. EDWARD NEISTER
Appellee:
EDEN PARK ILLUMINATION, INC., LARSON ELECTRONICS LLC, FAR UV TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and others
Baldwin v. Energy
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 24-1332
Petitioner:
CLARENCE EDWARD BALDWIN, JR.
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Neister v. Eden Park Illumination, Inc.
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 24-1317
Appellant:
S. EDWARD NEISTER
Appellee:
EDEN PARK ILLUMINATION, INC., LARSON ELECTRONICS LLC and FAR UV TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Aortic Innovations LLC v. Edwards Lifesciences Corporation
as 24-1145
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AORTIC INNOVATIONS LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION, EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES LLC and EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES (U.S.), INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.