Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Chinook Landing, LLC v. US
as 24-1884
Plaintiff:
CHINOOK LANDING, LLC, as personal representative of the Estate of John Lund
Defendant:
UNITED STATES and JOHN DOES, 1-15
Burger v. US
as 24-1249
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BASIL AGAPION, SOPHIA S. AGAPION, KATHE BURGER and others
Plaintiff:
GUILFORD BUILDERS SUPPLY CO.
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Haggart v. US
as 24-1256
Plaintiff:
DANIEL HAGGART, KATHY HAGGART, Husband and Wife, For Themselves and As Representatives of a Class of Similarly Situated Persons, GORDON ARTHUR WOODLEY, Personal Counsel for Kittinger Deed Claimants and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENISE LYNN WOODLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Chapman Spring/Garden, LLC v. US
as 24-1250
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CHAPMAN SPRING/GARDEN, LLC, CHANEY-FRYE #4, LLC, D.S. CHANEY PROPERTIES #6, LLC and others
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Personal Audio, LLC v. Google LLC
as 24-1020
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PERSONAL AUDIO, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
GOOGLE LLC
Traxcell Technologies, LLC v. AT&T Inc.
as 23-1246
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TRAXCELL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Defendant:
AT&T INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY LP, SPRINT SPECTRUM, LP, SPRINT SOLUTIONS, INC. and others
Traxcell Technologies, LLC v. AT&T Inc.
as 23-1436
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TRAXCELL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Defendant:
AT&T INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY LP, SPRINT SPECTRUM, LP, SPRINT SOLUTIONS, INC. and others
Sheller v. HHS
as 23-1746
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHAD SHELLER, as Personal Representative of the estate of DANIEL ELIAS SHELLER
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Personalized Media Communications, LLC v. Apple Inc.
as 23-1165
Appellant:
PERSONALIZED MEDIA COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
Cross Appellant:
APPLE INC.
Apple Inc. v. Personalized Media Communications, LLC
as 23-1167
Appellant:
APPLE INC.
Appellee:
PERSONALIZED MEDIA COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
