Cases 21 - 30 of 61
WORLTON et al v. USA
as 1:2022cv01569
Plaintiff:
CECILIA MARIE WORLTON, WILLIAM LAYNE WORLTON, BYRON E. BRIMM and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
ANDREW v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022vv01512
Petitioner:
KEN ANDREW
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
CLARK v. USA
as 1:2022cv01456
Plaintiff:
BRIAN ANDREW CLARK
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
ALLENDER et al v. USA
as 1:2022cv01403
Plaintiff:
STEVE ALLENDER, DAVID ANDREWS, PERSHENG BABAN and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
FRIE et al v. USA
as 1:2022cv01390
Plaintiff:
ANDREW FRIE and ALEXANDRA CARLON
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
ANDREWS v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022vv01324
Petitioner:
PAMELA ANDREWS
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
EBERLING v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022vv00778
Petitioner:
ANDREW EBERLING
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
SCHAEFER v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022vv00678
Petitioner:
ANDREW SCHAEFER
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
KOTALIK et al v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022vv00507
Petitioner:
MERCEDES KOTALIK and ANDREW BRABEC
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
SHORT v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022vv00129
Petitioner:
ANDREW SHORT
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
