Patent Cases filed in the Federal Circuit Courts
Cases 91 - 100 of 1,867
Carrum Technologies, LLC v. BMW of North America, LLC
as 24-1480
Plaintiff: CARRUM TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Defendant: BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC, BMW MANUFACTURING CO., LLC and BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE AG
Canatex Completion Solutions, Inc. v. Wellmatics, LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 24-1464
Plaintiff: CANATEX COMPLETION SOLUTIONS, INC.
Defendant: WELLMATICS, LLC, GR ENERGY SERVICES, LLC, GR ENERGY SERVICES MANAGEMENT, LP and others
Hangzhou Chic Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. v. Partnership And Unincorporated Associations
as 24-1472
Plaintiff: ABC CORPORATION I, ABC CORPORATION II, EBAY, INC. and others
Defendant: THE PARTNERSHIP AND UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE "A", GYROOR US, TOMOLOO OFFICIAL and others
Respondent: YANJIN-US
Canatex Completion Solutions, Inc. v. Wellmatics, LLC
as 24-1466
Plaintiff: CANATEX COMPLETION SOLUTIONS, INC.
Defendant: WELLMATICS, LLC, GR ENERGY SERVICES, LLC, GR ENERGY SERVICES MANAGEMENT, LP and others
Natera, Inc. v. NeoGenomics Laboratories, Inc.
as 24-1324
Plaintiff: NATERA, INC.
Defendant: NEOGENOMICS LABORATORIES, INC.
Vascular Solutions LLC v. Medtronic, Inc.
as 24-1398
Plaintiff: VASCULAR SOLUTIONS LLC, TELEFLEX LLC, ARROW INTERNATIONAL LLC and others
Defendant: MEDTRONIC, INC. and MEDTRONIC VASCULAR, INC.
Kitsch LLC v. Deejayzoo, LLC
as 24-1394
Plaintiff: KITSCH LLC
Defendant: DEEJAYZOO, LLC
Natera, Inc. v. CareDx, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 24-1357
Plaintiff: NATERA, INC.
Defendant: CAREDX, INC.
Natera, Inc. v. ArcherDX, Inc.
as 24-1287
Plaintiff: NATERA, INC.
Defendant: ARCHERDX, INC., ARCHERDX, LLC and INVITAE CORPORATION
CAP-XX, Ltd. v. Maxwell Technologies, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 24-1411
Plaintiff: CAP-XX, LTD.
Defendant: MAXWELL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?