Cases 11 - 17 of 17
PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, et al v. USA
as 1:2004cv00009
Plaintiff:
PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY , EUGENE, OREGON CITY OF and PACIFICORP
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
CONFEDERATED TRIBES V INTERIOR
as 04-1224
Defendant-Appellant:
DAVID ANDERSON, Assistant Secretary of Indian Affairs, GALE A. NORTON, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR and JOHN SNOW, Secretary of the Treasury
Plaintiff-Appellee:
THE CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE WARM SPRINGS RESERVATION OF OREGON
PHILLIPS V AWH CORP
as 03-1269
Amicus Curiae:
AD HOC COMMITTEE OF PATENT OWNERS IN THE WIRELESS INDUSTRY, AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION, AMERICAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant/Cross Appellant:
AWH CORPORATION, HOPEMAN BROTHERS, INC. and LOFTON CORPORATION
Plaintiff-Appellant:
EDWARD H. PHILLIPS
SEIBER V US
as 03-5010
Plaintiff-Appellant:
ALVIN SEIBER and MARSHA SEIBER
Amicus Curiae:
AUDUBON SOCIETY OF PORTLAND, INSTITUTE FOR FISHERIES RESOURCES, OREGON TROUT, INC. and others
Defendant-Appellee:
UNITED STATES
THE CONFEDERATED TRIBES V US
as 02-5167
Plaintiff-Appellee:
THE CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE WARM SPRINGS RESERVATION OF OREGON and WARM SPRINGS FOREST PRODUCTS INDUSTRIES
THE CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE WARM SPRINGS RESERVATION OF OREGON:
Defendant-Appellant:
UNITED STATES
KLAMATH IRRIGATION, et al v. USA
as 1:2001cv00591
Plaintiff:
KLAMATH IRRIGATION DISTRICT , TULELAKE IRRIGATION DISTRICT , ALL PLAINTIFFS and others
Defendant:
USA
Intervenor_defendant:
PACIFIC COAST FEDERATION OF FISHERMEN'S ASSOCIATIONS
Amicu:
OREGON, STATE OF , YUROK TRIBE , KLAMATH TRIBES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
THE CONFEDERATED TRIBES V US
as 00-5002
Plaintiff-Appellant:
THE CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE WARM SPRINGS RESERVATION OF OREGON and WARM SPRINGS FOREST PRODUCTS INDUSTRIES
Defendant-Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
