Cases 21 - 30 of 199
PALISADES NUCLEAR POWER, LLC v. USA
as 1:2022cv00713
Plaintiff:
PALISADES NUCLEAR POWER, LLC
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491 Tucker Act
Mitsubishi Power Americas, Inc. v. United States
as 1:2022cv00102
Plaintiff:
Mitsubishi Power Americas, Inc. and Mitsubishi Hitachi Power Systems Americas, Inc.
Defendant:
United States
Indiana Municipal Power Agency v. US
as 22-1377
Plaintiff / Appellant:
INDIANA MUNICIPAL POWER AGENCY, MISSOURI JOINT MUNICIPAL ELECTRIC UTILITY COMMISSION, NORTHERN ILLINOIS MUNICIPAL POWER AGENCY and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Valterra Products LLC et al v. United States
as 1:2022cv00013
Plaintiff:
Valterra Products LLC and Valterra Power LLC
Defendant:
United States, Office of the United States Trade Representative, U.S. Trade Rep. Katherine C. Tai and others
PT. Kenertec Power System v. US
as 22-1408
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PT. KENERTEC POWER SYSTEM
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
WIND TOWER TRADE COALITION
One World Technologies, Inc. v. Chervon (HK) Limited
as 22-1322
Appellant:
ONE WORLD TECHNOLOGIES, INC., dba Techtronic Industries Power Equipment
Appellee:
CHERVON (HK) LIMITED
One World Technologies, Inc. v. Chervon (HK) Limited
as 22-1321
Appellant:
ONE WORLD TECHNOLOGIES, INC., dba Techtronic Industries Power Equipment
Appellee:
CHERVON (HK) LIMITED
One World Technologies, Inc. v. Chervon (HK) Limited
as 22-1323
Appellant:
ONE WORLD TECHNOLOGIES, INC., dba Techtronic Industries Power Equipment
Appellee:
CHERVON (HK) LIMITED
One World Technologies, Inc. v. Chervon (HK) Limited
as 22-1320
Appellant:
ONE WORLD TECHNOLOGIES, INC., dba Techtronic Industries Power Equipment
Appellee:
CHERVON (HK) LIMITED
Power Probe Group, Inc. v. Innova Electronics Corporation
as 21-2354
Plaintiff / Appellant:
POWER PROBE GROUP, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
INNOVA ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
